Force Majeure Clause
What force majeure clauses contain, what to push back on, and what yours might be missing. We built this from published court decisions, law-firm surveys, and analyses of post-2020 force majeure disputes. Where the public data runs thin, we say so instead of guessing.
Check your clause against the market
Paste your force majeure clause. You get a score and a flag on each thing worth fixing. We analyze it, we do not store it.
What the market actually does
These figures come from published studies of force majeure clauses. They point in a direction rather than settle the question, because the samples are small, mostly from the COVID period, and mostly US. Each number below shows its source and sample size.
No public percentage exists for these (stated directionally)
- Payment carve-out: model clauses (BIMCO 2022, ICC 2020) build in a continuing-payment carve-out, pointing to a common market convention.
- Mitigation obligation: described as common in higher-specificity clauses, without a count.
- Economic hardship: courts do not treat it alone as force majeure unless the clause says so (EAPIL; Vici Racing, 3d Cir. 2014).
- eBrevia / BakerHostetler / QuisLex AI contract study, n=171 (via DFIN).
- Rutgers Business Review, Force Majeure Clauses and the COVID-19 Pandemic, n=621 SEC-filed JV contracts.
- Shook, Hardy & Bacon, Force Majeure and Common Law Defenses: A National Survey.
- EAPIL, The COVID-19 Pandemic and Commercial Contracts. BIMCO 2022 / ICC 2020 model clauses.
Stop drafting force majeure from scratch
Aline drafts and redlines against your own approved clause library, so every contract starts from language you already trust. Draft, redline, and query agreements 10x faster with AI.
The six points worth negotiating
| Issue | Market posture | Reasonable fallback | Push back hard |
|---|---|---|---|
| Payment carve-out | Payment obligations excluded from force majeure | Short grace period for banking-system failure only | Any clause that lets the counterparty stop paying during an event |
| Event list | Enumerated list plus "including, without limitation" | Enumerated plus a catch-all tied to reasonable control | A closed "limited to" list, which leaves you litigating the gap |
| Epidemic | Expressly named after 2020 (most clauses still do not) | "Public health emergency declared by a competent authority" | Silence; courts split on whether "act of God" reaches COVID |
| Notice | Prompt written notice with a workable window | Prompt notice, no fixed day count | Notice as a condition precedent on a 48-hour fuse |
| Termination trigger | Either-party right after a prolonged event (public median 90 days) | A longer trigger, either party | Indefinite suspension with no termination right |
| Economic hardship | Expressly excluded | Silence | "Material adverse change in market conditions," a repricing right in disguise |
Where these clauses fail
Reader assumes "act of God" covers a pandemic. It often does not. Most clauses in the data never named a pandemic (18% did). If the clause predates 2020 and nobody amended it, treat the gap as real.
Reader treats a cost increase as force majeure. Performance getting expensive is not performance becoming impossible. Courts do not excuse a party on economic hardship alone unless the clause spells it out.
Reader forgets how the clause interacts with the liability cap. A force majeure termination usually creates wind-down costs. If the cap covers direct damages but the force majeure clause says nothing about transition expense, no one has allocated that cost.
Sample force majeure clause
A balanced, mutual starting point that reflects the market postures above.
Neither party shall be liable for any delay or failure to perform its obligations under this Agreement, other than obligations to make payment, to the extent the delay or failure results from an event beyond that party's reasonable control, including acts of God, fire, flood, earthquake, epidemic, pandemic or public health emergency, war, terrorism, riot, labor dispute, or government action, provided the event could not have been avoided by reasonable precautions. The affected party shall give the other party prompt written notice, use reasonable efforts to mitigate the effects, and resume performance as soon as practicable. If the event continues for more than ninety (90) consecutive days, either party may terminate this Agreement on written notice, without liability except for obligations accrued before termination. Economic hardship or increased cost of performance shall not, by itself, constitute a force majeure event.
Frequently asked questions
Not under a well-drafted clause. Model clauses from BIMCO and ICC carve payment obligations out of force majeure relief. If yours does not, that is usually the first redline.
Only if the clause says so, or its catch-all is broad enough for a court to read it in. In one public study, 18% of clauses named a pandemic (eBrevia, n=171), so most do not. Clauses that name "epidemic" or "public health emergency" hold up far better.
Name the qualifying events, add a catch-all ("including, without limitation"), require prompt notice and mitigation, carve out payment, and give either party a right to terminate after a prolonged event. See the sample clause above.
Roughly "force ma-ZHOR." It comes from French and means "superior force."
No. "Act of God" is one category inside a force majeure list, and it appeared in about 75% of the clauses studied. Impossibility is a separate common-law doctrine that courts apply narrowly. Force majeure is contractual, so you get what you drafted.
Only what the clause lists, and US courts read the list narrowly. Common entries: acts of God, natural disasters, war, terrorism, government action, and now epidemics. If the clause omits an event and has no catch-all, a court usually will not add it.
It is French for "superior force." In a contract it means an extraordinary event outside either party's control, such as a natural disaster, war, or government action, that stops one side from performing. Rising costs or inconvenience do not count.
A party declares force majeure when it formally tells the other side that a qualifying event has stopped its performance, and invokes the clause to suspend or excuse its obligations. Most clauses require prompt written notice, so timing and method matter.
It is a contract provision that frees a party from performing when a specific, unforeseeable event beyond its reasonable control makes performance impossible. It suspends or ends that party's obligations, but only for the events the clause actually names.