NEW
AI Repository just launched this week! Try out the new features.
Redlining might sound like a small step in the contract cycle, but it often ends up being one of the most time-consuming.
To help with that, contract redlining software has stepped in and given teams better tools to track changes, manage feedback, and keep version control intact. But software alone won’t fix a disorganized review process. Without the right habits, even the best tools can only go so far.
That’s why having a clear set of best practices makes such a difference. In this guide, we’ll walk you through what contract redlining means, where people tend to get tripped up, and the habits that keep things on track.
The term redlining comes from the old practice of marking contract edits in red ink, so changes stood out clearly during reviews. Even today, digital tools like Microsoft Word highlight edits in red or with colored strikethroughs and comments, keeping the name alive.
At its core, contract redlining is the back-and-forth editing process that happens before a contract is finalized.
Each side reviews the draft, suggests edits, flags issues, and adds comments, all with the goal of reaching terms both parties agree on. It’s a key part of contract negotiations and prevents misunderstandings down the line.
Even though we have contract redlining software to speed things up, the workflow still breaks down if you're not careful. Here are some common pitfalls to watch for:
Even if you're using enterprise contract redlining software, these common mistakes can still slow you down. Avoiding them keeps things moving, builds trust, and allows both sides to reach a final agreement faster.
Redlining can be a lifesaver when you’re trying to catch issues before a contract gets signed, but only if it’s done right. Without a clear system, it can turn into a long, messy back-and-forth that frustrates both sides. The good news is that a few simple habits can make a big difference.
Consider applying these best practices to your current contract workflow:
One of the most important steps in the contract redlining process is making your edits visible and easy to follow. Always turn on 'track changes' in your word processing software. This way, every addition, deletion, or tweak is clearly marked.
It gives both parties involved a transparent view of what’s being changed and why. That’s especially important when legal teams are reviewing redlined drafts, since it helps them focus on key edits without wasting time trying to identify hidden changes.
Redlining contracts without leaving comments is a quick way to create confusion. If something seems off, explain your reasoning in a comment.
Whether it’s a suggested change to a payment term or a request to clarify language, a simple note like “Suggest aligning this with our standard payment policy” keeps the review productive.
Redlining legal documents without a clear system leads to confusion, delays, and missed changes. To avoid that, always work from one master version of the contract document.
Pick one file, give it a clear name, and use that for all edits moving forward. Keeping things tidy benefits everyone, especially internal and external stakeholders, who can easily stay aligned.
If you’re using contract management software, take full advantage of version history and user permissions. It saves you from guesswork and keeps the contract process moving in the right direction.
Remember: Redlining documents should be about reviewing proposed changes, not tracking down the right draft. Keep it simple, and keep it moving.
Vague comments slow everything down. If you're part of a contract redline process, you’ve probably seen the kind of feedback that makes people stop and ask, “What do they mean by this?”
Clear, direct comments help maintain momentum during contract review. When you take the time to explain why you’re suggesting a change, you make it easier for others to respond or adjust.
That is even more crucial when multiple people are reviewing the same draft across the entire contract workflow.
A few tips to keep your comments helpful:
Example: “Can we revise this to say payment is due 30 days after the invoice to match our standard terms?”
This is a critical process that supports successful negotiation. When you own redlines with clear input, you help the team establish clear objectives and move toward agreement faster.
Allowing legal teams and business units to collaborate is important, but letting too many people edit the same contract can slow things down and make the contract review process harder than it needs to be.
Not all contracts require input from every department, and when everyone jumps in with edits, the document quickly turns into a mess of conflicting changes and unclear direction.
A better approach is to assign one or two people to manage edits, often from your in-house legal teams or whoever owns that part of the negotiation. Others can still weigh in, but as reviewers or commenters, not editors. This keeps the redline clean and easy to follow.
For example, during a vendor contract negotiation, your legal counsel might be the only person making tracked edits, while finance and procurement leave comments related to pricing or payment terms. It helps focus the feedback and move toward a mutually beneficial agreement faster.
As you're reviewing a contract, it’s easy to get sidetracked by small grammar fixes or sentence tweaks. However, it's important to keep in mind that redlining isn’t a writing exercise.
The contract redlining process allows you to focus on the parts of the agreement that truly affect risk, cost, or obligations. But the more time you spend on cosmetic edits, the more likely it is that the entire process will drag.
Remember, contracts aren’t meant to be perfect essays. They’re working documents designed to reflect real business terms. If the wording is clear and correct, even if it’s not how you’d write it, leave it alone.
Redlining contracts should support more productive discussions, not bury relevant stakeholders in minor edits. So, here’s what to skip unless absolutely necessary:
Respect the original document and keep your focus on key business terms, obligations, and legal risks. A cleaner redline makes the collaborative process smoother and helps everyone lock in terms faster.
Contracts with lots of moving parts and multiple versions often lead to important details slipping through the cracks.
A standard checklist helps keep the contract negotiation process focused and organized, no matter how complex the deal or how many people are involved. It also keeps everyone (legal, commercial teams, and business stakeholders) on the same page.
Using a checklist gives you a clear path through the review. Rather than guessing what to look for or relying on memory, you’re working through a set of key items that matter most to your company’s interests.
Consider using this as a solid starting point for your checklist:
This kind of structure can avoid last-minute surprises. It also makes collaboration between law firms, in-house legal teams, and business leaders a lot smoother.
Before you send an initial draft to the other party, take a moment to make sure the right people on your team have reviewed the sections that actually matter to them.
Redlining documents without input from key stakeholders often leads to last-minute revisions, delays, or confusion later in the process. A little coordination up front goes a long way.
Let’s say you’re at a software company negotiating a new customer agreement. Legal should be the one reviewing the liability and indemnity language. Sales might focus on pricing and term length. Finance should confirm that the billing schedule fits internal processes.
When each group reviews only the parts they’re responsible for, things move faster, and edits are more thoughtful.
Still, this isn’t just about speed; it’s about clear communication and avoiding missed details. If no one owns the dispute resolution clause or the renewal terms, you risk sending out a draft that doesn’t reflect your team’s position.
Delays during contract reviews can hold up business operations and make deals feel stuck. If you’re handling commercial contracts or acting as in-house counsel, don’t let redlines sit untouched for days. A quick response keeps momentum going and shows you're serious about moving forward.
Even if you’re not ready to respond in full, a quick message to the other side helps maintain trust. Everyone’s working from the same document, so the sooner you send your edits back, the smoother the review cycle will be for both sides.
How you word your edits can make a big difference in how they’re received. During contract reviews, legal professionals often deal with sensitive contract terms that need to be handled with care.
Rather than making blunt demands like “Remove this,” try phrasing your suggestions as questions. Something like “Would it make sense to shorten the notice period to 15 days?” opens the door for discussion without sounding rigid.
This approach encourages the other party to carefully review your input instead of getting defensive. It also helps reduce tension, especially if there have already been version control issues or back-and-forth edits.
If you’re still managing contract reviews the old-school way, it’s time to make things easier on yourself. AI tools can take a lot of the pressure off by helping you manage contract risks and speed up edits without losing control.
Platforms like Aline bring AI right into your contract redlining process. You can build smart playbooks so the AI flags issues based on your rules. It even suggests redlines based on how your people usually respond, so you're not rewriting the same notes over and over.
Plus, everything lives in one place. No more version control headaches or surprise edits. You decide who can comment, edit, or approve, so legal, sales, and operations can all stay in sync.
Contract redlining is often a team effort that involves multiple departments all working together to get deals done. Throughout this article, we’ve covered the basics of redlining, where things often go wrong, and what best practices can keep everything on track.
From managing versions and comments to getting the right people involved at the right time, each step plays a role in making the contract workflow smoother.
Still, staying organized with basic tools only gets you so far. Aline gives you the structure, tracking, and AI-powered support needed to handle complex reviews with the speed you want.
You get smart suggestions, clear version control, and role-based permissions, all under one roof.
If you're ready to cut down review time and stop chasing drafts, try Aline today.
Start by understanding the intent behind each clause and focusing your edits on clarity, risk, and alignment with business goals. Use clear comments, avoid unnecessary rewrites, and follow internal review guidelines. Practice helps, but following a consistent process makes all the difference.
You can use word processing tools like Microsoft Word or Google Docs with tracked changes and comments turned on. Highlight edits, suggest revisions, and leave comments where context is needed. Manual redlining on physical documents still exists, but digital tools offer numerous benefits in speed and visibility.
Treat it like any other contract. Review key terms such as rent, duration, renewal, and liability. Make edits directly in the document using tracked changes, and include comments for anything you’d like to discuss or negotiate. If you prefer Microsoft Word, it offers more control for formatting and version history.
“Redline” refers to the visual markup of a contract where proposed edits and deletions are clearly shown. This makes the negotiation process transparent and allows both parties to see what’s changing. Contract redlining is important because it reduces miscommunication and supports fair review.
Yes, Google Docs supports suggested edits and comments, allowing for a level of redlining that works well for collaboration. For teams needing seamless integration, especially across departments, contract software platforms offer more control and tracking than Google Docs alone.
Contract redlining is important because it helps all parties clearly see what’s being changed, discussed, or disputed before signing. It reduces the risk of misunderstandings, protects business interests, and keeps everyone aligned during negotiations. Without it, key details might get missed or misinterpreted.
Brent is an attorney, a full-stack JavaScript engineer and the CEO of Aline.
Subscribe to our newsletter to receive new posts straight to your inbox 👇
