Legal teams already operate through workflows. Every request, review, and approval follows a sequence, even if that sequence is informal. The question is not whether a workflow exists, but how deliberately it is managed.
Legal workflow software brings structure and consistency to that movement. It formalizes how work enters the team, how it progresses, and how decisions are documented along the way.
When those steps are defined inside a system, the process becomes easier to follow and easier to manage.
In the sections ahead, we’ll break down what legal workflow solutions include, where they are commonly applied, and what to consider if you are evaluating one for your team.
Legal workflow solutions are tools that organize how legal work gets done.
You might hear them called legal workflow automation software, legal operations platforms, or legal process tools. Different labels, but same purpose. Essentially, they help legal teams move work forward in a clear, predictable way.
In many law firms and in-house departments, legal processes still depend on email chains, shared documents, and someone remembering to follow up. That works for a while. Then volume grows. Requests pile up. Repetitive tasks eat into the day.
Workflow software adds much-needed structure. When a request comes in, the system knows what happens next. It routes the task, assigns reviewers, tracks approvals, and records activity.
Most legal workflow automation software covers steps like:
If your legal operations feel reactive or hard to track, this type of system gives you visibility. You can see where work stands, who owns it, and what still needs action at first glance.
There are too many scenarios to list, but a few patterns show up again and again. Legal workflow management software usually steps in when work feels manual, repetitive, or hard to track.
Enterprise legal departments and law firms both use legal automation tools to cut down administrative tasks and reduce back-and-forth emails. The common goal is to streamline operations and make approval processes easier to manage.
Here are some of the most common use cases:
Legal teams adopt workflow solutions when work starts piling up, and processes feel hard to control. You might need legal workflow automation tools yourself when these issues start coming up:
The pressure on legal professionals keeps climbing, yet capacity rarely does. The average lawyer bills just 1,693 hours annually, well below many firm targets of 1,800 to 2,200 hours.
Almost half of the workweek, 48%, goes to administrative tasks. Another 33% goes to business development. The remaining 19% gets absorbed by training, firm management, and other non-billable work.
So, where does substantive legal work fit?
In-house legal teams feel this strain too. As requests increase, routine reviews and internal approvals start stacking up. Workflow solutions help automate routine tasks, reduce manual coordination, and create breathing room without adding headcount.
Approval delays often happen because no one has a clear sequence to follow. For example, a contract gets sent out for review, and everyone assumes someone else will respond first. Days go by, the sales team starts asking for updates, and legal is left sorting through versions and email threads.
Picture a sales agreement that needs input from legal, finance, and a department head. Without structured workflows, each reviewer weighs in on their own timeline. At the same time, feedback overlaps and deadlines tighten.
Approval workflows create order. They set the review path, notify each person in turn, and give you visibility into where the request stands, so progress does not depend on constant follow-ups.
One of the most frustrating parts of running a legal practice is not knowing where things stand. You get asked for a status update, and suddenly you’re digging through emails or Slack threads trying to piece it together.
Imagine a vendor contract submitted two weeks ago. The business team assumes legal is reviewing it. Legal assumes it’s waiting on finance. No one has a clear view of the timeline, and the request quietly stalls.
Without visibility, small delays turn into bigger problems, but workflow systems can change that dynamic. You can open a dashboard and see every active matter, who owns it, and what step comes next.
A typical day can involve administrative work like tracking approvals, updating contract logs, responding to status questions, coordinating signatures, and re-entering the same information into multiple systems.
None of it is particularly complex, yet it steadily takes up time and attention.
Legal teams often handle work such as:
Some tasks will always require human judgment and direct involvement. Legal review, risk analysis, and nuanced contract negotiation cannot be handed off to a system.
Still, many of the surrounding administrative steps follow predictable patterns. Automating repetitive tasks reduces the operational load while keeping decision-making firmly in human hands.
Compliance expectations in the legal sector continue to grow, and the margin for error feels smaller every year. Protecting sensitive data, documenting approvals, and maintaining accurate records all require consistency. Informal processes make that difficult.
Consider a scenario where a vendor agreement requires documented review from legal and finance before signature.
If that approval trail lives in scattered emails, proving compliance during an audit becomes stressful and time-consuming. The work may have been done correctly, but the documentation tells a different story.
Workflow systems introduce built-in compliance features that log actions, timestamps, and reviewer decisions automatically. That structured record supports internal policies and external requirements while giving leadership confidence that processes are being followed as intended.
Legal work often sits in the middle of everyone else’s priorities. In-house teams field legal requests from sales, finance, HR, procurement, and leadership, all at once. Of course, each group has its own deadlines and systems, and none of them slow down simply because legal is busy.
Picture a customer contract that needs pricing approval from finance, policy review from legal, and sign-off from an executive. Sales wants it closed this week, and finance has quarter-end reporting. Legal is reviewing five similar agreements at the same time.
It's easy to see that without a clear structure, coordination turns into constant follow-ups and status checks.
As organizations grow, these complex workflows become routine. One request can branch into multiple parallel reviews and conditional approvals. Tools built with seamless integration in mind help align those moving parts so collaboration feels organized rather than reactive.
Most legal workflow platforms share a similar foundation. The features may look different on the surface, but the building blocks tend to follow the same pattern:
Every legal workflow starts somewhere, and intake is usually that starting point. Instead of requests coming through scattered emails or quick messages, teams use structured forms to gather the right information from the beginning.
For legal services teams, this creates clarity early. A request for contract review can include deal value, deadlines, counterparty details, and relevant documents at submission.
On the other hand, an HR request can capture employee information and policy references upfront. That context reduces back-and-forth and avoids incomplete submissions.
Good intake systems also route requests automatically based on type, priority, or business unit. The person submitting the request knows it has landed in the right place, and legal has a clear record of what came in, when, and from whom.
Once a request is submitted, the next question is who needs to review it, and in what order?
Automated routing answers that without someone manually forwarding emails or chasing sign-offs.
For contract review and other legal documents, the path often depends on factors like deal size, risk level, or department. The workflow adjusts automatically based on those inputs to make sure that the right people are pulled in at the right time.
A typical approval flow might look like:
Each step triggers the next. Approvers receive notifications, and the system records decisions along the way.
At some point, someone is going to ask you, “Where does this stand?” And if answering that question requires looking through emails or checking three different systems, tracking probably lives in too many places.
With task management built into legal workflow software, you can see the full picture in one place. A contract review might show that legal has approved, finance requested a revision, and an executive sign-off is still pending.
This kind of tracking reduces manual errors because ownership and next steps are already defined. Teams often experience immediate productivity improvements simply because less time goes to reconstructing updates and chasing responses.
Legal workflows run through documents, which means the system needs to connect naturally to how your team drafts and stores them.
Strong document management keeps everything tied together inside the workflow. That usually includes:
Most legal teams do not set out to build reports. They just want the work to move. Still, questions come up. How long did that contract take? Who approved it? Did it follow internal policy?
Workflow software records that activity automatically. If a regulator asks for confirmation that a data processing agreement met regulatory requirements before signature, the complete audit trail shows each review, edit, and approval in order. The record is already there because it was captured as the work happened.
Over time, reporting also highlights trends. You might see that certain deal types take longer or that approvals stall at the same stage. AI-powered automation updates this information in real time, so operational efficiency improves without extra manual data entry layered on top.
What matters most will depend on your priorities, your practice area, and how your team currently works.
Start with the friction points you feel every day. Here are a few areas worth paying attention to:
At the end of the day, the right solution should reduce administrative overhead without adding another layer of complexity to manage.
Throughout this guide, contracts have come up again and again. That is not a coincidence. In many teams, contract review, approvals, and tracking make up a large share of daily legal work.
Improving workflow often leads straight into improving contract management.
And Aline brings those two areas together in one system.
It handles structured intake, routing, approvals, and document collaboration while also supporting drafting, redlining, signing, and contract analysis. Instead of managing workflows in one tool and contracts in another, everything lives in a connected environment.
With features like dynamic templates, built-in e-signatures, AI-assisted drafting, and reporting, Aline helps you move from request to execution without breaking the flow.
Plus, contract analysis tools surface key terms and insights so leadership can make informed decisions without digging through full documents.
If your workflow challenges frequently trace back to contract volume, it may be time to look at the bigger picture.
Start a free Aline trial today.
A legal workflow is the step-by-step path a legal task follows from start to finish. It might begin with a request, move through review and approval, and end with execution or filing. In practicing law, these steps repeat constantly. Contract reviews, policy updates, vendor approvals, and client communications all follow some type of workflow. The difference is whether that path is informal or structured inside a system.
A simple example is a contract review process built into legal technology. A sales team submits an agreement through an intake form. The system routes it to legal for review, then to finance for pricing approval, and finally to an executive for sign-off. Each stage is tracked automatically. Approvals, edits, and comments stay tied to the document, often inside familiar tools like Microsoft Word.
The best tool depends on your team’s size, complexity, and goals. Some tech companies focus on standalone workflow automation. Others combine workflows with contract management and analytics. The right fit usually balances flexibility, ease of use, and strong integration with existing systems while keeping operational costs under control.
There is no single answer. Some AI tools specialize in contract drafting, others in document review or analytics. The strongest platforms use AI to assist with manual review, surface insights, and support decision-making rather than replace professional judgment. The best option is the one that supports your processes while improving speed and client satisfaction.
Brent is an attorney, a full-stack JavaScript engineer and the CEO of Aline.
Subscribe to our newsletter to receive new posts straight to your inbox 👇
